- Directs counsels of both respondents to assist the court with legal questions and complete preparations by next hearing on August 19
- At one point, Salman Safdar requested court to allow him to speak at rostrum but CJP denied
ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi on Tuesday questioned some of the observations made by the Lahore High Court (LHC) while rejecting the bail of former premier Imran Khan in eight May 9 cases.
A three-member SC bench headed by CJP Afridi and comprising Justices Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui and Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb resumed the hearing on the bail pleas on Tuesday.
Barrister Salman Safdar appeared on behalf of Imran, while Punjab Special Prosecutor Zulfiqar Naqvi was representing the state.
Back in November 2024, the Lahore Anti-Terrorism Court had turned down Imran Khan’s bail in the cases related to the May 9, 2023 riots that included the attack on the Lahore corps commander’s house, known as Jinnah House.
On June 24, the Lahore High Court also rejected the incarcerated PTI founder’s plea challenging the ATC verdict. Subsequently, Imran moved the Supreme Court against the high court’s decision.
During the hearing, CJP Afridi took note of some “findings” issued by the LHC in its detailed verdict of dismissing Imran’s bail pleas.
“Can final observations be given in a case for bail?” the chief justice questioned rhetorically.
Based on the same principle, he said, “For now, we will not touch upon whether the findings in this case are right or not. We will not go into the legal matters at the moment.
“If we touch upon the legal findings, then the case for either party can be affected,” CJP Afridi explained.
He directed the counsels of both respondents to assist the court with legal questions and complete their preparations by the next hearing.
“The Supreme Court will not issue any such findings that may affect the case,” the top judge reiterated.
At one point, Safdar requested the court to allow him to speak at the rostrum but CJP Afridi denied that plea.
Subsequently, the bench issued notices to the Punjab government and adjourned the hearing till August 19.
Earlier on June 29 last, a two-member SC bench had taken up Imran Khan’s bail pleas but adjourned the hearing without issuing notices, as Safdar could not appear.
Imran’s appeal, filed through Safdar, claimed that the PTI founder has been accused of conspiring and abetting violence on May 9.
However, at the time of the alleged offense, Imran was in the custody of the National Accountability Bureau. Therefore, his involvement in violence was “impossible,” the petition argued.
On LHC’s rejection of the bail pleas, the fresh appeal claimed that the court relied on “engineered and fabricated evidence,” which included “stale, discredited, and delayed statements of police officials.”
In its detailed verdict, the two-member LHC bench comprising Justice Syed Shahbaz Ali Rizvi and Tariq Mahmood Bajwa observed that the prosecution had evidence that reflected Imran’s role in the violence that broke out on May 9 following his arrest.
The bench reproduced the statements of two police officials and prosecution witnesses, who claimed to have secretly attended PTI’s meetings wherein Imran allegedly gave instructions to other leaders to attack military installations in case of his imminent arrest from the Islamabad High Court (IHC).
The meetings were allegedly held at a rest area of Chakri, Rawalpindi, on May 4 and at Imran’s Zaman Park residence in Lahore on May 7-9, 2023.
